HomeSample analyses
What a finding
looks like.
One worked example, built from a fictional contract, so you can judge the format before you pay.
Illustrative example. The document, company, clauses and findings below are invented for this page. They are not from a real customer or a real contract, and they are not a promise of what Prism will find in yours.
A high-risk clause, flagged and redlined.
Counterparty claims ownership of all derivative work, including pre-existing IP.
Market standard for an advisor SAFE side-letter limits IP assignment to deliverables created during the engagement. As written, the clause covers anything you've built "prior to or during" — which sweeps up your codebase. Recommend renegotiating before signing.
The rule, and the summary.
Findings come from rules in your playbook. The example above would be triggered by a rule like this one (also fictional):
RULE ip-assignment-scope
WHEN a clause assigns intellectual property to the counterparty
THEN flag HIGH unless scope is limited to deliverables created
during the engagement and pre-existing materials are excludedThe Markdown summary lists findings by severity. An excerpt for the same fictional document:
# Acme Series Seed · SAFE — summary (illustrative example)
## High
- § 3.2 Most-favored-nation overreach
- § 7.2 IP assignment scope unbounded — limit to deliverables created
during the engagement; exclude pre-existing materials
## Medium
- § 1.4 Conversion trigger ambiguous
- § 5.1 Information rights asymmetric
## Low
- § 4.3 Pro-rata language standard
- § 9.1 Notice address typoYou get this for your own contracts, against your own playbook.